* * * * *
Table of Contents:
* * * * *
New York City’s zionist-“jewish” Mayor Bloomberg recently visited his beloved “Israel,” when and where he publicly informed the “Israelis” that the City of New York was entirely behind them and hence behind their ceaseless wars against the Arabs, thus supporting and encouraging that zionist terror-state in their “holocaust” and dispossession of the Palestinians, and in their further and future wars against the Arabs or the Mohammedans.
And so this “jewish” mayor Bloomberg thinks, proclaims,
admits or confesses
Like American itself,
So though there remain many decent Gentiles in
Furthermore, this Bloomberg is a billionaire media mogul
who, out of his very deep pockets (and via vast political
advertising/propaganda) purchased his “public” office, his present political
position, his mayoralty. And now the citizens of NYC and the Gentile country
are beginning to see why: To serve and further his secret, hidden imperialist-
* * * * *
And by thus proclaiming that his Jew York City is solidly behind “Israel,” their zionist agenda, and hence their endless war against the Gentiles, and presently the Mohammedans, mayor Bloomberg has further painted a “bull’s eye” target on this bloody and whorey old city as the financial, economic, cultural (if not political) capital of the very empire which has for decades been funding, supplying (with “weapons of mass destruction and/or mass-murder”) and encouraging this mass-murderous “Israeli” violence against (and dispossession and robbery of) the Palestinians and other Arabs, both Christian and Mohammedan.
And so (for all those who didn’t already know this was so)
Bloomberg has thus put a fresh coat of blood-red paint on “Uncle” Satan’s
capital city, imperial queen and “Babylonian whore.” What’s her name again? (
But some people, myself included, don’t want the city they
live in to be guilty of any more imperial and mass-murderous wars of aggression
against the Gentile nations around God’s globe, and thus justly deserving of
retaliation in kind, if only token retaliation, to thus pay this murderous,
mass-murderous old Satanic “jewish” whore back in her own bloody violent coin
(Apo./Rev, 18:4-7). And hence for
And yet here the mayor was in “
But merely to admit that this is so, (that
* * * * *
An informed voter seldom expects the rich and powerful to personally seek public office. For their usual tactic is to secretly purchase political candidates, and then afterwards to secretly pull their official strings within the dark, unseen. And either way, of course, their secret or undeclared intent is to further enrich and empower themselves at the expense of the public they claim and pretend to “represent,” and have solemnly sworn to serve.
But infinitely worse than these plutocratic pimps are those oligarchs who purchase public offices intending to annul or terminate constitutions, to trample “inalienable” rights under their official hooves, and to obligate or involve their purchased offices, cities, states, nations or even empires in foreign wars for their personal profit or benefit, and even for the benefit or furtherance of foreign powers, races, nations or business interests for whom such treacherous “public officials” (or their purchasers) are secretly, covertly, treasonably working.
Such treacherous and treasonous creatures as these are truly the greatest possible public enemies within public offices. And there ought to be a law against these sort of things, don’t you think? Or one that is actually enforced? But what cop is gonna put the cuffs on Bloomberg, what “prosecutor” accuse and “try” him, what judge “convict” and what jailer jail him?
Whose side are you on, mayor Bloomberg?
But even if he publicly denies it, he’s already publicly declared himself to his “Israeli” brothers, allies or masters—that his city was entirely behind them—and hence entirely behind their continuous genocide of the Gentiles, the Palestinians, the Arabs, the Iraqis and the Mohammedans). But I for one have nothing against any of these Gentile peoples, nothing whatsoever.
(And cities have been bombed for far less than this. See
And I noticed this predominantly and belligerently pro-“Israeli” foreign policy, this zionist priority, racial loyalty and “jewish” nationalism of mayor Bloomberg’s wasn’t any part of his campaign platform, promises or propaganda.
(But then “jews” have always and everywhere been commonly known to place nothing above themselves, nothing above loyalty to their (international) race or nation, nothing above their racism or their nationalism (“Nazism”), and nothing above their atheistic, Marxist or “communistic” super-racism on the one demonic hand, and/or their “messianic” or Talmudic super-nationalism (or SuperNazism) on the other. And so voters should have known that even if Bloomberg didn’t mention it. And Bloomberg didn’t mention it.)
(But then the mayor’s “democratic” opponent was a “jew” too.
So go figure why
And so what this Bloomberg says or promises and what he does
or delivers are two very different things. (But New Yorkers already knew that.
See below.) But if this Bloomberg had honestly said, that if elected he would
annul or terminate the
And yet such is his domestic
policy, and hence his hitherto hidden agenda—revealed to all with eyes to see
And hopefully all New Yorkers (and all others besides) can
now also clearly see Bloomberg’s also no longer secret foreign agenda, “his honor’s” zionist foreign policy, his racial
and national (racist or “nazi”) alliance with “
And in that extremely racist, zionist and “Israeli” case,
Did you know that, dear reader? I did. For look, it was written long ago. (Apo./Rev. 17:5)
* * * * *
And consistent with Bloomberg’s public proclamations or
official pledges of unequivocal and total (if not unanimous) Jew York support
The mayor’s ridiculous explanations are the following:
Public marches and assemblies on the city streets are not good for traffic
because they block it. (That’s certainly true.) And public assemblies in the
public parks are not good for the grass because they trod on it. (That’s
certainly true too.) And so therefore the
So, on the one hand, and the official side, we have the city traffic, the grass AND THE MAYOR’S ZIONIST AGENDA AND FOREIGN POLICY. And on the other hand and unofficial side we have our constitutional rights to “peaceably assemble,” to publicly speak and to be publicly heard by all who would lend an ear (or two). For some public speakers are honorable men.
* * * * *
But alas, the park-grass simply won’t tolerate any public assemblies thereupon, and hence it should and must be officially protected from our constitutional rights, liberties, and (most of all) feet.
For grass should be looked at and admired, but never walked, sat nor reclined upon. And especially public grass—(grass seeded, tended, and maintained by public taxes)—should never, ever be used (i.e. abused) by the public. All public grass should be placed within fences or stored behind glass within a modern museum of public grass.
I’m not kidding. This is no joke. (But of course it is a joke—an official, fascistic, tyrannical joke. And yet few people are laughing.)
But clearly this official “love of grass” explanation is ridiculous, and therefore this tyrant in public office should be publicly ridiculed out of office for it. And this storm or chorus of ridicule should naturally begin and be lead by the supposedly free and independent mass-media within this supposed capital city of the “free world’s” media!
And yet it’s not happening. And yet here’s a front-page
story, and a “scoop”—which “journalists” otherwise crave and covet. And yet the
“jews’papers” and the “jewish” broadcast monopoly (both in and outside
So go figure. Is “jewism” zionism, and vice-versa? And if
not, then what’s the difference? Why is the “jewish” mass-media protecting this
And if not, then why not? Because park-grass really and truly is far more important than the city’s citizenry, the nation’s public, and their “inalienable” constitutional rights to assemble, to speak, to be heard, and to listen?
And yet, if you notice, for certain other races, (“jews” or
Negroes, e.g.), these broadcast “journalists” and networks make a great big
fuss about “civil” or civilian or rights. So why not here, now and in this
“civil rights’ case”? Because it doesn’t serve nor further the cause of
* * * * *
But let’s further examine Bloomberg’s official “grassy knoll” explanation why anti-“republican” and/or anti-[zionist]war protestors cannot peaceably assemble within his zionist “jewish” city to hear political speeches (anti-war or anti-“republican” party speeches); to distribute or share their political literature; to listen to (possibly political) music and words; to send their strong, forceful, youthful and energetic message to the “republican” party, the nation, the U.N. and all the world (via the mass-media monopoly located within this “cultural capital” of “the free world”—and there’s the “jewish”-zionist ignorance, silence and/or censorship); and to generally and peaceably commune with one other.
Let’s see now; let’s put both contending values on the grand scales or balances of justice.
On the one hand we have the
* * *
And this is simply because, according to these “park commissioners” (personally appointed by the mayor—and apparently in this particular case to do “his honor’s” anti-constitutional or tyrannical bidding), NYC’s parks are not “public parks.” They do not belong to the public. They belong to “the city,” and hence to these very “public officials, who must therefore be paid or bribed by the public to use, enjoy, or assemble therein. (Again see “Stern.”)
But sometimes the parks’ commissioner (perhaps upon instructions from the mayor) simply refuses to be bribed or paid, and hence denies “permits” for public assemblies within the mayor’s private “city parks”—as is apparently the case this very tyrannical summer.
So you can’t play nor protest in the public park, and you can’t “sing dirges in the dark,” because every night and day and in every bloomin’ way, life, liberty, music and protest must go and stay away. Or so says this fascist, zionist, anti-Christ mayor and his big, fat, portly or porky blue meanies. (But let’s not go away and say we did!)
For the parks are supported and maintained by “public” taxes, and not by the billionaire Bloomberg’s vast private treasury, though “his [imperious] honor” acts as if central park were his personal property or his own back-yard.
* * *
And furthermore, those who come a long way to this city to peacefully assemble, to voice their grievances or to protest this evil zionist war of the mayor’s and of his zionist “republican” party, should not be officially prevented from (nor persecuted for) camping in the city’s park(s). One has to be rich to afford these N.Y.C. hotel rates. And (as all the billionaires know, whether mayors or not) most of us aren’t.
Though similarly officially forbidden
to do so, the “Yippies”—(a Marxist, “jewish,” anti-Vietnam war,
marihuana-smoking, youth protest group, stemming from the 60’s: those “days of
(But in this present case, the mayor, being a “jew,” and the protestors, being Gentiles, protesting against a zionist or “jewish” war (against who else but Gentiles?), would (unlike the “jewish” “Yippies” or yesteryear) most likely be attacked by the tyrannical “jewish” mayor’s mercenary, fascistic and violent police dogs, for the great “crime” of “trespassing on public property.”)
But of course, we can all see what the real crime is and who the real criminals are. They are our usurpatious and tyrannical public enemies within public offices. They wear tyrannical badges of authority, and wield fascistic clubs and firearms of oppression. And all the while they deny you, dear citizen, your divine or sacred constitutional rights to “keep and bear arms,” to assemble, to speak to, to hear from and to commune with your fellow citizens, etc., etc., etc.
* * * * *
But instead of reciting or intoning this ridiculous, deceitful and hypocritical cant about the vulnerability, sanctity or inviolability of public grass, an honest fascist dictator might simply say:
“I hereby deny your constitutional rights to assemble, speak, march or protest within my city, etc., because your weak, pathetic and toothless constitution simply does not apply within my city, my separate realm, my independent kingdom, my sovereign city-state. (Just note how the NY state and the national supreme courts nod in silent agreement with me—in their official approval of my ‘unconstitutional’ decrees). As I and my police totally deny, annul and outlaw your supposedly ‘inalienable’ constitutional right to ‘keep and bear arms’ within my city; and as I (or we) with total impunity arrest, try, convict and jail all those who dare constitutionally ‘keep and bear arms’ within my city—without my prior mayoral permission or my all-important city permit, so I likewise officially deny your supposedly ‘inalienable’ or ‘inviolable’ constitutional rights to march, assemble, speak or listen within my city without my prior mayoral permit or official permission to do so, which I simply and repeatedly refuse to give you. And half of what little I’ve given you you’ve refused. And your pathetic insistence, petition or prayer that your precious constitution is your city permit is a big joke to me and my loyal law enforcers.
“See how I and my policemen piss and on you and your constitutional rights? See how we repeatedly ride roughshod over your alleged liberties? And what are you (or any of your allegedly constitutional representatives or public officials) going to say or do about it? Absolutely nothing, you pathetic weaklings. So shut up, get out of my city, and don’t ever come back. You and your kind are not welcome here. This is my party. This is and my city. I am the host and you are not my guests. You came here to crash my party, to ‘protest’ me, to rain on my parade, to poop on my republican party. So get out of my city and don’t ever come back, or I and my ‘unconstitutional’ and ‘fascistic’ police, judges and jailers will lock you up and throw away the key. Take your all-too-delicate constitution and get the hell out of my town. For both of you are most unwelcome here. Clear enough, you pathetic political and economic losers?”
But a dishonest fascist dictator would (by definition) give false reasons, phony explanations or sham (and perhaps even mocking) excuses for his official denial of the constitutional rights of others. He might, for example, deny the public’s rights to assemble in the public parks by instructing his “parks’ commissioner” to deny the public “permits” in the far greater, sacred or inviolable interests of the park grass. And if that’s not an official joke or mockery, then I don’t know what is.
(For the NYC “parks’ commissioner” is a mayorally appointed “public” office, and hence he’s public official personally indebted to his official appointer and mayoral master for his public livelihood.)
“Hay, somebody’s got to stand up for the grass. [Bloomberg’s slavish ‘park commissioner’ might publicly and ridiculously explain–Ed.] The poor things are defenseless. And they can’t speak nor fend for themselves. That’s where I come in. That’s my job, as I and the mayor see it. I represent the grass. Whereas those who would heartlessly assemble thereupon do indeed have tongues and voices to speak and represent themselves. Let them therefore do so, I have nothing against that, but somewhere off my grass, upon concrete or asphalt e.g., which can’t feel their big, mean, thoughtless, trampling feet, and where no public blades of grass will be harmed, trampled, killed or murdered by the public.
“I’m a public servant. And grass is people too, you know. And they’ve also got civil rights: public rights, city rights, though perhaps not your fancy, dancy constitutional rights. The green blades are my botanical wards, whom I am solemnly sworn to ‘uphold and defend to the best of my abilities so help me God’ (and mayor Bloomberg).
“What’s that you say? The mayor has also officially forbidden all public assemblies off the grass, upon city concrete or asphalt? Hmmm! I’d like to help you, but that’s simply not my department.
“Have you tried the Streets’ Department?
What that? They sent you here to me? Hmmm? After the parks and the streets
leaves only…? I wonder, can you people possibly walk on water? For I don’t
think our mayor holds imperial sway over the
* * * * *
So much for the grass, the parks, the works of God. But what of the asphalt, the streets, the works of man? As to assemble on the former would indeed harm some blades of grass, so to assemble in the latter would indeed disrupt some city traffic. So both are to be officially forbidden (or rather not “permitted”)?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but methinks there’s only two things a large crowd or multitude can do: They can assemble in one place for whatever cause or reason—(e.g. to hear speeches, listen to music, watch sports games, plays, movies, or whatever). Or they can walk (or march) from one place to another. Or they can do both: They can walk to an assembly, or assemble and then walk, perhaps to another place of assembly.
And so far as he thinks he can get officially or “legally” get away with it (via his “jewish” or zionist Jew York judges) this mayor Bloomberg has largely (though not absolutely) denied the public city “permits” to do either, or both—(as if the public needed city permits to do either, or both). But force or tyranny, by definition, runs roughshod over “sacred” constitutions, “inalienable” rights and/or “inviolable” liberties. (See/hear Max below.)
For anti-war protestors simply have no place (and little to no “civil” rights) within Bloomberg’s Jew York. And his fascist, zionist, anti-Christ police force are always there to back “his [unconstitutional] honor” up.
For opponents, protestors or “demonstrators” against this
“jewish”-Amerikan war against
(But “Treason never prospers, for when it does, none dare call it ‘treason’.” For prosperous treason is rather called “Law.”)
* * * * *
And so therefore there shall be no public marches, no public
assemblies and no public speeches within
(E.G. he has once never denied the zionist “Israelis” a
permit to march in his city, as they do every year—right up
And so what is the political lesson here? If the NYC mayor
agrees with your group, he grants you a “permit” to march or assemble, or to
assemble and then march, or to march to an assembly. But if he doesn’t, then he
doesn’t, and you and your group are attacked by his vicious police dogs for
daring to exercise your constitutional rights (without a “permit”) within this
repressive, fascistic, unconstitutional, Marxist, “jewish,” zionist,
imperialist, supernational or SuperNazi city, this bloody, guilty,
mass-murderous Babylonian whore and queen of her “Uncle” Satan. (
For this is the nature and method of Tyranny: It tolerates
* * * * *
Also true to zionist form and tyrannical character, on Feb. 15, 2003, just before this latest imperialist “jewish”-Amerikan invasion, conquest and occupation of an (ex-sovereign) Gentile nation, Iraq, this zionist mayor Bloomberg similarly forbade war-protestors to assemble around the “United Nations’” building in east mid-town Manhattan.
(The would-be U.N. petitioners had vainly imagined the U.N. was not the Jew. N., and hence they though it might forbid or stop this latest “jewish”-Amerikan war (invasion, conquest, robbery and occupation) against yet another (ex-sovereign) Gentile nation. And hence they came to assemble to petition the Jew N. to not officially approve, bless or sanction this latest “jewish”-Amerikan war and invasion.)
But mayor Bloomberg had his city police block off access to
the Jew N. And he had them misdirect the anti-war multitudes away from the Jew N. building.
Northwards towards the
And so on that earlier occasion also, precisely like this
In fact “his [arrogant, fascistic and imperious] honor” had granted the public a “permit” to assemble on that day before the U.N. bldg. on the east shore of mid-Manhattan, but the multitude arriving from the west was so big the police forcibly blocked their approach to the U.N., thus preventing their mayorally “permitted” assembly. And the police ordered the public to march away to the north or south, saying they would have U.N. access that way. (But of course they couldn’t, and this was yet another big blue lie.)
And so though the public did not have a mayoral “permit” to march
in the streets on that cold winter day. They were ordered, commanded and forced
to do so by “his honor’s” police—i.e. to keep moving, to keep from
congregating, to immediately walk or march away
from the U.N. (Is that ironic?) And though the public did
So what’s the “civics’” lesson here? This: The public tyrant in public office will hardly grant you a “permit” at all (to exorcist your “inalienable” rights and liberties within his imperial city). And even when “his honor” does, he might not honor it. (So to mayoral hell with this “permit” business.)
What a political asset, what a “foreign agent of influence”
the “Israelis” have in this their
* * *
And so here in this summer of 2004 we once again observe and
suffer these very same official, illegal, unconstitutional, repressive,
fascist, Marxist, “communist” “jewish” tactics—now during “his [zionist]
honor’s” hosting of his zionist-“republican” party convention within “his”
Bloomberg apparently thinks
For “we the people” wanna have a political party “convention” and assembly too. But “his honor” says “No,” not in his town, and not at this time. For “his [zionist] honor” will hear, tolerate and “permit” nothing but praise for (and hence neither blame nor protests against) his and his evil, zionist-“republican” party’s imperialist, zionist, “messianist,” “jewish,” supernational, SuperNazi, anti-Gentile, anti-Christian and anti-Mohammedan “hundred years’” war agenda (allegedly against “terrorism”). (But if so, then surely these greatest of terrorists, these imperial or SuperNazi “jewish”-Amerikan, zionist and “Israeli” terrorists, would have to start with themselves, and then work their way down to their “terribly” defensive and reactive Gentile opponents.)
And so to protect his imperialist, terrorist, zionist
agenda, Bloomberg and his rabid, fascist police dogs will “permit” no one to
rain on their
* * * * *
Methinks marchers or walkers must naturally take up more (road) space (and hence block or stop more traffic) than when assembled together in one place. And so, if the mayor’s official argument is against the public’s blockage of city traffic, and against the public’s trodding on the public’s grass, then why not simply “permit” the public to assemble in one paved-over public place—such as e.g. Times’ Square (the “crossroads of the world”) or the area around the U.N.? Why?
Is it because the whole world might then see the enormous
size of the crowd thus opposing the likes of mayor Bloomberg and their zionist
(But in fact Bloomberg is representing, serving and
furthering the zionist minority in Jew York. For “his [racist, zionist,
“jewish”] honor” is in favor of and preference for a alien race and a foreign
Is this not why on
* * * * *
I suspect Bloomberg and his subordinate city officials don’t want the protestors of his zionist, “jewish,” “Israeli” wars against the Gentile Arabs or Mohammedans to assemble in one place anywhere in NYC—neither in the street nor in the park. For the bigger the multitude (thus officially or “legally” forbidden to peaceably assemble) the bigger the fascist forbidding them to do so. And the mayor doesn’t want all the world to see just how big a fascist dictator he really and truly is.
For it’s all too plain (for any and all with eyes to see) what a tyrant one is if tens (or even hundreds) of thousands of people are assembled in one place to protest his, her or their party’s obviously unpopular “public policies.” And so tyrannical public enemies within “public” offices simply outlaw, criminalize or refuse to “permit” such public assemblies within public streets, parks or even in rented halls. And they sic their perfidious, treacherous, sociopathic, and mercenary police-dogs upon such “criminals” inside the park, upon the street, or wherever they dare assemble or congregate without a mayoral “permit.”
For the cops are also solemnly sworn in to “uphold and
defend the constitution of the
(So where in hell is God to help them then?—seeing this anti-Christ mayor of Jew York certainly won’t!)
* * *
And by the way, Bloomberg’s predecessor, mayor Adolf Giuliani, was the very same way—though not nearly as bad. Giuliani also did not and would not respect the “constitutional” rights of civilians within his (unconstitutional) city to assemble, to speak, to listen and be heard. He would simply not tolerate nor allow the public assemblies or speeches of those with whom he (or his “jewish” masters) disagreed with enough to officially censor—and again simply by declining or refusing to “permit” them to assemble, to speak or to amplify their voices.
For clearly, if a multitude comes to head a particularly popular speaker speak, only those close enough to him (or her) can hear him without vocal amplification—(and especially if hecklers and would-be censors are within the crowd and determined to stop the speech, and hence to deny the speaker the right to speak and his listeners to hear him).
Censorship, whether civilian or official, is not only anti-free-speech, it is also anti-truth. Censorship is about liars protecting their lies from the truth. Is it not? Censorship is about Darkness’ hatred for the Light of Truth, and about Darkness’ fear of being publicly exposed and seen or for what It really and truly is. Official censorship (whether presidential, gubernatorial or mayoral) is about official possession and control of the public mind, and hence the public body or “body politic.” For if “Out of sight [or out of ear, then–Ed.], out of mind.” (Know what I mean?)
And so mayor Giuliani would similarly sic his two-legged police dogs upon such “politically incorrect” bodies and souls who’d dare exercise their constitutional rights without his prior, unconstitutional, fascistic, dictatorial (and always spatially and temporally limited) mayoral “permission” to do so!
I vividly recall one particularly disgraceful episode and
lesson in “civics” officially taught to one and all one fine fall day below
(The “black Israelites” e.g. were there and amplified, and again broadcasted their usual obnoxious, racist message that “the white man is the Devil.” I myself hadn’t know that. And I’ve yet to locate my horns and tail. But you gotta have faith—the belief in things unseen.)
Anyway, it was the social-political event of the season. Anyone and everyone from every group across the political spectrum was there: visiting, communing, discussing, debating, shouting, screeching, preaching, teaching, proselytizing, and selling their literature or giving it away. (The LaRouches, e.g., were giving away their 1992 paperback, The Ugly Truth About the A.D.L. Very interesting! See the Political Appendix for more.)
But again the political or “civics’” lesson was (and
remains) that your constitutional rights are respected and “permitted” in NYC
only if the mayor’s office likes you and your message, but otherwise not. You
have no real and true, genuine or “inalienable” constitutional rights here.
Forget about it. And that’s neither “democracy” nor “republicanism,” but
tyranny, fascism, Marxism, communism, totalitarianism. And by “precedent law,”
tyranny unopposed or not overthrown becomes tyranny established. (And there’s
the permanent fascist rub and its bloody violent police club!) And so tyranny,
totalitarianism, Marxism or communism is nothing new to
* * * * *
So do the math or watch the scale. Which dear reader is more weighty, important, vital to a “republic” or a “democracy”—to a republican or a democrat: the sacred and constitutionally-guaranteed rights of civilians to assemble, speak, hear, etc.. Or the city traffic and the park grass? And which is more important or vital to a tyranny or dictatorship, to a tyrant or dictator, disguised as “democrat” or republican,” or whatever the hell he’s pretending to be.
And which is more important to this mayor Bloomberg?
But now at last we’re beginning to see precisely why
billionaire Bloomberg thought so much of this city to buy its highest office—(I
mean besides to gain yet more money and power, which we always characteristically
expect from such plutocratic creatures). But it was evidently and apparently to
capture the city’s highest elective office for his beloved “
* * * * *
Or, Free Speech Leads to Truth, which is Evil and Tyranny’s Antidote, and so Free Speech (and hence Truth) is Outlawed, Criminalized or not “Permitted,” Persecuted or “Prosecuted.”
Free speech, dear readers, is the fastest, quickest, shortest way to Truth, because all citizens are then free to speak and be heard, and hence the truest citizens, and hence the Truth (or at least the truest truth in the area) arrives to all with ears and hearts to hear It. Bingo!
But Truth does not serve nor further Lies, Deceit, Trickery, Evil, Darkness and Tyranny. On the contrary, Truth undoes, disproves, dispels and exposes Evil, Its lies, deceits and pretenses—by which dark tricks Evil is best served and furthered. And therefore Evil hates, silences, censors, attacks, persecutes (“prosecutes”) and even murders Truth. Evil forcibly forbids or prevents Truth to speak and hence be heard, spread, disseminated, published.
And whenever and wherever Evil is enthroned (as e.g. within
Censorship is about keeping the Truth out of the “public arena,” the “market-place of ideas,” the assembly-hall, the parks and the streets, the city and the countryside. Censorship is the Liar keeping the Truth out of the ring. Censorship is the Liar protecting his lies from the Truth, with which he and they cannot stand, nor withstand.
And why? Because Truth disproves and exposes lies and their Liar(s) for the false things they say and the false things they are. Like a false or phony boxing champion, Evil or the Liar cannot ever “permit” the true champion to enter his ring, to thus publicly beat his deceitful carcass into the canvas.
And so Evil or the Liar therefore forbids (or does not “permit”) the Truth to ever enter his official ring of lies, his “public arena,” his city or his realm. The Liar “permits” only his subordnate liars to repeat his lies, or his official “ringers” to pretend to fight or debate him, and hence to convincingly fall down on cue, or to bow down in apparent assent to and faith in this false champion of ‘Truth,” this tyrannical public Liar.
Evil or the Liar fears and hates the Truth, Its antidote (and the freedom of speech by which Truth arrives) like Darkness or the mythical Vampire fears and hates the Light of the Sun.
But the Truth is neither afraid nor hateful of freedom of speech, debate and publication, and hence the Truth. For what has the Truth to lose? Why should the Truth fear Itself? Why should the Light fear the Light? Why should Beauty hate or fear the mirror (of Truth)?
But Darkness and Falsehood indeed fear, hate and repress and persecute Truth and Light. For they have much to lose from Them: Public disproof and exposure of their lies, deceits and trickery, and hence the loss of their high reputations and political positions. And when and wherever such dark things are enthroned (within public offices: mayoralties, city councils, national parliaments, judgeships, governorships, presidencies, etc.) they then fight Truth and Light officially, “legally,” dictatorially or unconstitutionally.
* * * * *
Whether we know it or not, dear reader, neither you nor I can afford to surrender, to lose or to live without the freedoms of speech, of self-defense, of assembly and of association.
For without the former we live in darkness, within the lies
of our evil, ugly and tyrannical masters, who are best served and
And without the latter (to which assembly) belongs we are prey unable to congregate in self-defense. Hence we are raped, robbed, scattered, killed and devoured by our demonic racial or national enemies—who of course and would make it a “crime” for us to ever defend ourselves against them, but of course no crime for them to prey upon us to their black hearts’ content—(precisely as the “Israelis” have always treated, preyed upon and devoured the Palestinians).
To mentally and physically enslave the populace or citizenry, all would-be tyrants must outlaw or criminalize freedom of speech and publication—(whereby the truth “which sets men free” comes to the mentally and physically enslaved); and freedom of assembly—(thus keeping all ears from hearing the truth, and all citizen-slaves deep within their slave quarters); and freedom of association—(by which citizen-lambs freely congregate together and sidestep, avoid or say “No thank you” to their officious, tyrannical wolf).
* * * * *
Truth is the very best public disinfectant or antidote to falsehoods, lies, deceits, tricks, and hence to tyranny which employs all these. And so the freedom to speak and hear, to write and to read is methinks the very best “public policy.”
And therefore, I don’t give a damn, care nor object if the public want to peaceably assemble to hear e.g. “separatist” talk about how we are far better off by or with “ourselves alone” (“sinn fein”); or to hear speeches about Martians or “aliens,” leprechauns, orcs, elves, hobbits or angels; or to hear speakers advocating, promoting or preaching love, indifference, hatred or war (against e.g. Gentiles, Christians, Mohammedans, Arabs, Palestinians, etc.); or advocating, preaching or promoting racism, nationalism or “nazism,” super-racism, super-nationalism or “SuperNazism” (whether Gentile or “jewish” imperialism, i.e. zionism or “messianism”); or preaching socialism, anarchism, constitutionalism, humanism, communism, Marxism, “jewism,” Talmudism; or pornography, promiscuity, masturbation, homosexuality, bestiality, even pederasty or child-molestation (?); (Note: like violence or war, to publicly preach or advocate all such forms of sexual perversion or debauchery is not the same as publicly showing, practicing or doing it—(even Amsterdam, Holland, Nevada U.S.A. and NY, NY have their pornographic or whorey limits); or advocates of vegetarianism, carnivorism, cannibalism—(well, maybe not cannibalism); also protectionism, free-trade; self-medication, and what-have-you? etc.
Or else to hear arguments against all these things. E.G. to advocate or preach non-violence, or arguments against sex for pleasure, or against warring, attacking, invading, conquering, genociding or “holocausting” Germans, Japanese, Arabs or Mohammedans, etc.
For to publicly speak and to hear for or against such things
is the citizen’s’ human or constitutional (if not God-given or divine) liberty
or right to do so. And so
* * * * *
And again freedom to speak and hear, to write and read is the very best and fastest way to Truth. And so a genuine truth-seeker, citizen, scientist or judge wisely seeks to hear or read each and every description and explanation of the subject or thing, and each and every argument or side of the question or issue—that so he (or she) may hear the truest (speaker, writer, description, explanation or argument). (Why reinvent the wheel?)
But “the Father of lies” (and Its demonic spawn—John ) wants freedom of speech only for themselves, and freedom of assembly only for their listeners. And if the public won’t willingly come and listen to them, then they force them to be its captive audience. (See e.g. “Shindler’s List.”)
And know it or not, and like it or not, and even though Truth may sometimes be ugly or unpleasant to look at, or may leave a bad taste in your mouth like sour or bitter medicine, Truth is of great value and is good for you too. For houses, lives, nations or empires not built upon the solid rock of Truth (however Gentile, “jewish,” American, or “jewish”-Amerikan) cannot long stand. (Matt. 7:24-27) And, whether you know it or not, dear reader, you don’t want you and yours to be caught sleeping inside such a weak and truthless structure when the roof falls or the walls cave in. And they shall indeed cave in.
* * * * *
And, by the way, what ever happen to that old (“jewish”-Amerikan?) recollection of Voltaire, “I totally disagree with what he said. But I’ll fight to the death for his right to say it”? What ever happened to that? Where did that go? Down Orwell’s “memory hole”? (Yeah, but why?) Why don’t “jews” say that anymore? For surely they used to. So what’s different now?
Was that saying merely one “jew” cynically protecting the extreme or unpopular speech of other “jews”? And now that the American nation (or empire—and especially its empire city) is totally controlled by “jews,” and the American mass-media (based in that imperial city) is totally monopolized, owned or controlled by “jews,” they can now stop their old free-speech pretense, take off their free-speech mask, and (officially, legally) censor, silence and/or crucify the Truth which sets men free (from lies), politically and otherwise, and hence which naturally, characteristically and unavoidably exposes “jewish” lies and liars? (John 8:32)
Is that why? Because freedom of speech/Truth neither serves not furthers Evil, and hence Evil’s false, deceitful, guileful, anti-Christ, racist, anti-Gentile, anti-Mohammedan, “jewish,” zionist, communist, imperialist, messianic” or Satanic causes, agents and/or children,? (John 8:44) Is that why?
* * * * *
(“But if, as you say, the mayor of NYC doesn’t want the protestors of his imperialist, zionist-Amerikan war in the middle east against the Mohammedans to march, assemble or protest anywhere within his city, then why has he granted them a permit to do just that on Sunday, Aug. 29, the day before the Republican party convention begins the following Monday?”)
Because he had to (politically). Otherwise it would be too
plain and obvious even to pigs that “his honor” is a fascist swine. And so “his
[zionist, republican] honor” granted his protestors the most unworkable and
inhospitable site possible: Far beyond the pale of settlement and behind police
barricades on west street by
And again it’s just a road. And so the huge crowd will be
stretched lengthwise north-south along that road. Think about it. It’s
impossible, unworkable, hopeless—as cynically, deliberately and malevolently
And yet the mayor and his official lackeys are calling this their “free-speech zone.” In other words, everywhere else in NYC is officially not a “free speech zone.” But of course this applies only to those who disagree with “his [zionist] honor.” For this mayoral “free speech zone” is not for the mayor his spokespersons and his zionist “republican” party to go and speak freely herein, but for everyone who dares disagree with them. Thus all political dissenters or critics of the imperialist, zionist “republican” establishment are officially banished into civic limbo way out in nowhere land where no one else can possibly hear them. (Let them there shout out to the sky, the fishes and the highway.)
And the imperialist, zionist “republican” party is to be
held in midtown within
In other words, Bloomberg and the other “republican” zionists don’t want to hear a word from their protesting critics, and won’t have to, since they are not invited to their posh party, and shall be forcibly banished therefrom, and shall only be “free” to speak behind the red velvet ropes (or rather the interlocking metal police barricades) over a mile away. In other words, they shall be penned in, contained, confined or imprisoned within the mayor’s “free speech zone” for the duration of their “permit” to speak (to each other). They have no “permit” to move. They have no “free-movement zone.” They have a steel pig-pen wherein they shall be “permitted” to “speak freely,” but shall not be permitted to leave for the duration of their “free-speech” “permit,” after which time they must immediately disperse or face mayoral arrest (for first amendment “crimes” of (peaceful) assembly, movement, speech, etc.).
So much for “Uncle” Satan’s “free speech zone.” But if the
(The public has been mayorally “permitted” to march by the Garden that very same Sunday before convention Monday. But afterwards they are “permitted” only to return immediately to their pig-pen out by the noisy, desolate and depressing west side highway: their “free speech zone.”
(What’s that saying?: “[If] Out of sight [or earshot, then] out of mind”; or “In outer space no one can hear you scream.” And that of course is Bloomberg’s precise “republican” point, his malevolent zionist purpose, and his censorious “jewish” intent.
But the zionist-imperialist “jewish” mayor of
* * * * *
According to the
And the false watchdogs of our sacred constitutional rights and liberties, the “supreme justices” of Jew York city, state and “jewish”-Amerika, (much less the racist, Marxist, “jewish,” communist, zionist “A.C.L.U.”) once again not only fail to bark—much less to bite or chase this tyrant away, but by their deafening silence they nod together in subtle approval of this malevolent “jewish” dictatorship and this racist zionist tyranny within NYC.
Hence all of NYC is an anti-constitutional or “no free-speech [nor assembly] zone.” But shall this stand? Heaven forbid!—but not the imperial “jewish”-Amerikan mayor, his zionist judges, and his fascist police dogs. (Woof ! Woof !)
* * * * *
Then let’s see want we’ve got: We’ve got an imperial
zionist-“Christian” tyrant within
And that’s Soviet, communist, Marxist, zionist, racist “jewish”-Amerika for you, dear reader. How’d you like to live there? (Me neither.) So let’s not.
And so we see what’s good for the “re-publicans” (who, by definition, claim to give the state or gov’t back to the public), i.e. to assemble or “convene” in NYC, is not at all good for the public or the citizenry—according the city’s “republican” (i.e. zionist “jewish”) mayor. (So go figure.)
So what the Gentiles need is a political party of their very
* * * * *
(“OK, but why do you put the Jews and Israelis in quotes?”)
(Because I can’t put them in “Free-Speech Zones”?)
(“Fair enough !”)
* * * * *
Freedoms “permitted” are freedoms denied. To “permit” speech is to outlaw or criminalize it (without a “permit”). To “permit” public assembly, movement, marches, etc. is the outlaw or criminalize them (without “permits”). To “permit” constitutional rights and liberties is to outlaw (annul and murder) the constitution. (And that’s not very nice.)
As to “permit” gun ownership is to outlaw gun ownership (without a “permit”); and as to “permit” or “license” individual movement (by foot, horse, horseless carriage or automobile) is to criminalize said movement (without said “permits” or “licenses”); so to “permit” speech or to “license” publication(s) is in fact to officially outlaw them (without said “permits).
And therefore to perpetually, entirely and absolutely deny,
annul, abrogate, violate, “alienate,” kill and bury these officially “permitted”
(or denied) freedoms forever, all the would-be tyrant need do is to
To officially “permit” constitutional freedoms is to officially reduce all citizens into subjects begging their tyrants or sovereigns for the permission or the “right” to use them—(if perhaps only for a few short hours, and within a few short city blocks)—after which all permits and persons must go back into the tyrannical boxes, back into their bureaucratic drawers, and back into their home prison cells. Such is the criminalization and “prosecution” of free-association and public assembly.
Shall this official tyranny stand, dear reader, and hence we and all our rights and liberties fall beneath it, and under its dark and total(itarian) shadow? Why be politically, tyrannically, officially reduced to begging his fascistic majesty for the right, permission or “permit” to exercise our “inalienable” constitutional liberties? Do we wanna go live there, dear readers? Then let’s not and say we did.
And so to “permit” constitutional rights, freedoms or
liberties is to outlaw the constitution—which is our permit. And therefore we don’t need no stinkin’ “permits”
from presidents, governors or mayors to use or exercise our sacred,
“inalienable” and inviolable constitutional rights, freedoms or liberties. And
if the supreme or inferior courts and judges of this land were at all
pro-constitutional, they would say so too. And any “public servant” who says
otherwise is an anti-constitutional tyrant and would-be fascist dictator, an
official and totalitarian “clear and present danger” to public liberty and
welfare, and an obvious public enemy within public office who should be
immediately recalled, and obviously should
* * * * *
The zionist party (whether “republican” or “democrat”) has
purchased or captured key American “public offices” from the president (of the
“jewish”-Amerikan empire) on down to the mayor (of the empire city). They’ve
got the mass-media, the printing presses, the “public’s” broadcast waves.
They’ve got A.B.C., N.B.C., C.B.S.,
P.B.S. and Murdock all screaming in demonic, terrible, blood-thirsty
choral unison to spill yet more rivers of Gentile, Palestinian, Arabic or Mohammedan
blood. They’re got “nuke ’em” Limbaugh and “kill the Arabs” Hannity on their
zionist talk-radio, WABC—(which, by the way, declared and launched their
imperial W.W. II from
What they don’t have, dear reader, is you and I: our tongues, our ears, our pencils, our publications, and our web sites. But even their almighty “jewish,” zionist mass-media monopoly is not quite enough for them to totally obliterate your (or even my) itty bitty Truth, dear reader. And so they feel they must outlaw you mouth and your ears, and criminalize your right to assemble, to listen, to speak and be heard, to read and to write. And why? Because you, dear reader (or I, even I), might just speak or hear, read or write the Truth. And Truth sets enslaved or deceived minds free (John ), thus releasing or liberating the Liar’s’ mental thralls and dupes, which thus upsets “Uncle” Satan’s poisonous apple cart. And thus Truth “terrifies” and threatens Evil’s SuperNazi empire: Its tyrannical, mass-murderous, zionist, “jewish,” anti-Gentile, anti-Christian and anti-Mohammedan imperial city, nation and empire. (Apo./Rev. 17:1-7)
* * * * *
But free people do not need “permits” to peacefully assemble
or march, whether in the public parks or in the public streets. (That why
they’re called “public.”) And the
For to say they do (need “permits”) is clearly to annul, annihilate or tear up the U.S. constitution, which does not say, dear fellow citizen, that you and your countrymen have an inalienable, absolute constitutional right to assemble, except whenever and wherever any “public official (president, governor, mayor, policeman, dog-catcher or whatever) says otherwise, or denies you a “permit” to do so.
Can you see, dear fellow assembly-person, that the very concept (much less reality) of political “permits” effectively annuls, abrogates our constitution, and all our precious, priceless inalienable rights supposedly granted therein? What earthly good is this, that or any other constitution if you need a (political) “permit” to use it? Do you understand? If this “permit” business stands, the constitution falls. And vice-versa, if the constitution is to stand, (or rather to ever get up on its feet once again), this political “permit” nonsense must fall. And there’s an end to this official mayoral tyranny.
But this billionaire Bloomberg, because he has bought the office of mayor, evidently thinks he has also purchased our constitution and our supposedly “inalienable” rights, which he thus tears up in our astonished faces and violently stamps into the ground under his and his porkmen’s official hooves? But this Bloomberg, and all other emperors and/or fascist dictators, such as those in “Washington,” D.C., are thus officially demonstrating to us all that our priceless rights are indeed “alienable,” annullable, dismissible by imperious edict, dictatorial decree, official “permit” (or denial of same). Shall this Bloomberg stand and our liberties thus fall? Heaven, George Washington, the founding fathers and you and I (even I) forbid !
Correct me if I misread or misquote
it, read reader, but methinks Amendment I does not say, “Congress shall make no law…abridging [restricting—(much
less forbidding, criminalizing or outlawing)–Ed.] the freedom of speech, or of
the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
the Government for redress of grievances”—unless
the mayor of New York City decides, decrees or dictates otherwise. It doesn’t
say that. And so, dear reader if the mayor refuses to submit to (indeed annuls,
outlaws, criminalizes and “prosecutes”) “the
supreme Law of the Land” [
* * * * *
And so the
What is the political or “civics’” lesson thus officially
taught and leaned “right here in river city”? It is this: That Power or Tyranny
“permits.” But weakness is “permitted.” That Power grants (withholds or retracts)
“rights.” But weakness has its rights granted to it, withheld from it and
inevitably retracted from it/them—(just like right here in
And now this from professor Max Stirner’s The Only One and His Property (a.k.a. “The Ego and His Own”); Leipzig, Germany, 1845:
My freedom becomes complete only when it is
but by this I cease to be a
merely free man, and become an own man [a self-owned man–Ed.]. Why is the freedom of the peoples
a “hollow word”? Because the peoples have no might! …. Because they are not of
the “mighty”! Might is a fine thing, and useful for many purposes; for “one
goes further with a handful of might than with a bagful of right.” You long for freedom? You fools! It you
took might, freedom would come of itself. See, he who has might [e.g.
the mayor of
for “freedom” rings loudly all around. But is
it felt and known what a donated [“permitted”–Ed.] or
chartered freedom must mean? It is not recognized
in the full amplitude of the word that all
freedom is essentially
—self-liberation —that I can have
only so much freedom as I procure for myself by my ownness [power, might–Ed.]. Of what use is it to sheep [in
the “sheep meadow,” e.g.–Ed.] that
no one abridges their freedom of speech? They stick to bleating. Give one who
is inwardly a Mohammedan, a Jew, or a Christian, permission to speak what he
likes: he will yet utter only narrow-minded stuff. If, on the contrary, certain
others rob you of the freedom of speaking and hearing
[such as the mayor of Jew York and his anti-constitutional army–Ed.], they know quite rightly wherein lies their
temporary advantage, as you would perhaps be able to say and hear something
whereby those “certain” persons would lose their credit. [Did you hear that, dear reader?–Ed.]
If they nevertheless give you freedom, they are simply
knaves who give more than they have. For then they give you nothing of their
own, but stolen wares: they give you your own freedom, the freedom that you
must take for yourselves; and they give
—or calm [or when the
time of its “permit” has “expired”–Ed.];
it requires always a —gentle and moderate breeze.
And again from “mad” Max Stirner,
If the press [speech, assembly or we–Ed.] was to be free, nothing would be so important as precisely its liberation from every coercion that could be put on it in the name of a law. And, that it might come to that, I my own self should have to have absolved myself from obedience to the law.
Certainly, the absolute liberty of the press [speech, assembly or we–Ed.] is like every absolute liberty, a nonentity. The press [speech, assembly, etc.–Ed.] can become free from full many a thing, but always only from what I too am free from. If we make ourselves free from the [politically, anti-constitutionally, tyrannically, dictatorially–Ed.] sacred, if we have become graceless and lawless, our words too will become so.
As little as we can be declared clear every coercion in the world, so little can our writing [speeches or assemblies–Ed.] be withdrawn from it. But as free as we are, so free we can make it too.
It must therefore become our own, instead of, as hitherto, serving a spook [a god, an idol, the Throne, the Crown, the State, the Gov’t–Ed..
People do not yet know what they mean by their cry for liberty of the press [speech, assembly, etc.–Ed.]. What they ostensibly ask is that the State shall set the press free; but what they are really after, without knowing it themselves, is that the press [speech, assembly, etc.–Ed.] become free from the State, or clear of the State. The former is a petition to the State, the latter an insurrection against the State. As a “petition for right,” even as a serious demanding of the right of liberty of the press, it presupposes the State as the giver, and can hope only for a present, a permission, a chartering. Possible, no doubt, that a State acts so senselessly as to grant the demanded present; but you may bet everything that those who receive the present will not know how to use it so long as they regard the State as a truth: they will not trespass against this “sacred thing,” and will call for a penal press-law against every one who would be willing to dare this.
In a word, the press [speech, assembly, etc.–Ed.] does not become free from what I am not free from. [p. 280-81]
(“School’s out for summer. School’s out forever. School’s been blown to pieces.”—Alice Cooper)
* * * * *
And so, because this fascist, zionist, tyrannical mayor
Bloomberg has officially, unilaterally and tyrannically broken any
constitutional contract we might have had with him, therefore we have no
constitutional duty whatsoever to obey him and his violent, repressive,
fascistic police dogs. On the contrary, it is not only our right, but our duty as
citizens of these
(For I dare suppose it is not yet a “crime” within tyrannical, imperialist, anti-Christ, zionist, “jewish”-Amerika to cite or quote it.)
We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with creation inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
That, to secure these [divine, God-given, “inalienable”–Ed.] rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government [i.e. city, county, state, national, super-national or imperial; Gentile or “jewish,” anti-Christ or zionist–Ed.] becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it,…. when a long train of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them [“the people”–Ed.] under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.
Can you dig it, dear reader? (I knew that you could.)
Our rights and liberties are gifts from God (if not also from ourselves and our ancestors). And so whenever or wherever president Bush, mayor Bloomberg or any other so-called “public servant” tries to take them away from us (much less ever succeeds in this evil, demonic and tyrannical intent), it follows they are clearly acting as agents of Satan, as public enemies in “public” offices, and as our official enemies. So let us therefore regard and treat them (and their evil agents) as such.
Note how throughout the 20th century anti-Christ or “jewish”-Amerika’s “Uncle” Satan roved world-wide spreading “freedom” and “liberty,” and all the while tightening Its tyrannical noose around the American citizenry. And now the tyrant’s trap is about to spring, and all true patriots to fall and swing. Far better therefore to hang together than separately, don’t you think?
Welcome to the real world where freedom ain’t free, where
life, liberty and property don’t come “guaranteed” or fancily wrapped in some
pretty piece of constitutional paper, but has to be fought for and defended
(against tyrannical enemies) day after day, by violent tooth, bloody claw and
(“If I had a
And “If I had a bell [a liberty bell—one not quite so cracked–Ed.], I’d ring it in the morning…evening, all over this land. I’d ring out freedom…”)
* * * * *
(“Tell me what can a poor boy do, except to sing for a rock & roll band,…”)
* * * * *
I don’t mind fellow citizens being filthy rich—depending on how they got so filthy rich. I don’t wish to excite the jealousy of the poor (“proletariat”) against their (“bourgeois”) ruling class like some Marxist demagogue, communist agitator, or class-warfare practitioner. What I do mind is those filthy rich oligarchs who purchase “public offices” with hidden political agendas—(other than to get even more rich and more powerful, which everyone naturally expects from such plutocratic creatures who think their money can buy everything and everybody).
And money certainly does (and by definition can) buy all
whores or prostitutes everywhere—however official or unofficial, uniformed or
not. But not every body in
“Let’s see. What are my choices?: My job, my badge, my position, my salary, my city pension and my welfare? Or your ‘inviolable’ rights as a citizen and your precious constitution?—(which I, by the way, at my induction, once solemnly swore to “uphold and defend, so help me God” (if neither Bloomberg nor Morgenthau).
“No, I never actually read it. I looked at it once, but the words were too big and too hard for me.
“So these are my choices: me or your rights. Hmm…? OK, I’ve decided. (No contest really)
“Hands……up! You filthy citizen! You constitutional terrorist!
“For I’d rather be a ‘fascist pig’ (as my kids say), than defend your rights and lose my pay! It’s who I am. It’s what I do (for money, and hence not for you. Don’t get my wrong. I’m fond of rights, and especially my own, whatever they are and wherever they come from. But your or my rights don’t pay my mortgage. Obedience to my superiors pays my mortgage. And so when and wherever I have to chose, you and your rights are going to lose. Sorry!”
* * * * *
Non NYC readers probably don’t know this, but last year (2003) this tyrannical city mayor sicced his police dogs upon the city, its people and its visitors to officially and “legally” rob them of their hard-earned money? For billionaire Bloomberg had been spending far more taxpayer money that he was extorting from his citizens (or rather subjects) in taxes. And so he send “NY’s finest” to hold up citizens in the street: to fine folks for non-crimes and misdemeanors: e.g. for honking their horns; for crossing the street anywhere outside of those white “crosswalk” lines you see at intersections; for spitting in the street on or the sidewalk; for riding their bikes on sidewalks; for sitting on subway steps, placing their feet on subway seats, taking up two subway seats, even on near empty trains; for drinking alcohol in public (the anti-“open container” law); and for many other such “crimes.”
(I remember one warm sunny afternoon I was in the park just north of its mid-southern border, above the skating rink, and I was about to wash my hands in a drinking fountain/basin, when a cruiser came into view. And so I waited for it to go by before I dared do the deed. Hey, I didn’t know there was no city law against it. I still don’t. Anyway, that’s how fascistically ridiculous it got, and all over the five boroughs too. Just ask any New Yorker. They’ll tell ya.)
And when confronted with citizen complaints, this Bloomberg denied all knowledge and responsibility for this official robbery of the citizenry. He retorted that the laws were on the books and had been passed by the city council, and that the policemen were merely enforcing these laws on their own initiative, not his.
(Here again the mayor was clearly lying, as he is also
surely lying about his allegedly beloved park grass, and as he is lying by
omission about his beloved foreign power, “
Clearly this Bloomberg had his aides look through city old city law books to find legalistic excuses for robbing (fining) citizens on the streets, in the parks and on the subways. And clearly he’d ordered his police to enforce these city “blue” laws.
(I’m deducing all this. I’ve never seen this in print, much less ever officially admitted or confessed.)
But neither Bloomberg’s police, nor his judges, nor his city council would dare contradict their imperious mayor, and admit they were merely following “his honor’s” orders. What despicable and official swine!
Even the policemen’s union (or “benevolent association”) wouldn’t dare once bark against this imperious mayor Bloomberg. But robbing citizens on the street with pens and pads and ticket-stubs isn’t particularly “benevolent,” is it? So they should change their name to “malevolent policemen’s association,” don’t you think?
* * *
(And what incredibly bad taste,
predatory natures, and sociopathic characters these NYC cops must have and be
to so serve such a tyrannical and predatory commander-in-chief. These Yankee
thugs in blue uniforms are official agents of tyranny and shameless,
conscienceless gangsters with badges, guns and clubs. They clearly have no
regard whatsoever for the
And by the way, this “stick-em-up” on the street mayoral policy (perpetrated by his official cops…and robbers) ceased abruptly a few short months after it began, and without official explanation or mayoral comment. (But then why should “his [truthless] honor” say anything about it—since he has absolutely nothing to do with it?) And yet these alleged city laws were not taken off the city books by the city council who supposedly put them therein—as the mayor alleged. And so why did this official city policy so “spontaneously” begin, and why did it so abruptly end, if not because in both cases this mayor had imperially decreed it so?
“So it shall be written. And so it
shall be done. And even if it is written, and I don’t want it to be done within
my sacred (if unconstitutional) realm, then it shall not be done, and it shall
be unwritten. And even if I recently wrote it myself, or ordered it to be
written by my scribes, and hence to be done by my faithful servants, and I have
since change my mind divine, then it shall be unwritten, and it shall be
undone. And any priest or layman who dares read aloud what I have unwritten
(however sacred, hieroglyphic, scriptural or constitutional) shall by my royal
servants be quite undone. And any one who dares says otherwise, shall not be
wise within my eyes, and shall likewise be undone. For so it shall be written.
And so it shall be done.”—(Yule Brenner, pharaoh of
* * * * *
But are our constitutional rights to “keep and bear arms” and to “peaceably assemble,” etc. not also “on the books.” So why aren’t they enforced and protected (“from all enemies foreign and domestic”—yes even official, presidential, judicial or mayoral) by the NY city council and the NY city police? Because they’re not on any books which the city council, or city judges or city policemen read, subscribe to, adhere to or believe in?—(all their constitutional oaths to the contrary notwithstanding)? Because the imperial mayor will not have such “civil rights” enforced within his uncivil, unconstitutional and tyrannical realm? Because he has simply decreed otherwise. And because his fascistic forces in their blue uniforms are in lock-step behind their fascistic leader? Is all this not plainly and precisely so?
(Again, what despicable and official swine!)
And so once again we clearly see that “might is ‘right,’ ”; might is “legal”; might is whatever is “enforced”—however unconstitutional, tyrannical or evil. Let us then take this practical lesson in civics or politics to head and to heart.
* * * * *
In the 1980’s, certain predatory Negroes and Mestizos would extort money from NYC subway riders by menacingly asking them, “Do you have five dollars”? And many intimidated citizens would simply and immediately do as they asked. For though the street punks literally demanded no money, their threatening behavior and menacing tone did indeed demand it.
But this borderline criminal enterprise was put to a stop by one Bernie Goetz, the “subway vigilante,” a “jewish” gunman and subsequent would-be elective public servant. He realistically felt threatened and hence defended himself from several menacing Negro thugs on the subway one particularly bloody evening. And so this particular subway scam screeched to a halt that violent night.
(But I’ll betcha Bernie wouldn’t order his police to officially rob the citizenry on the subways the streets or the parks of the city. No way.)
And Bloomberg’s thugs in uniform did not ask their victims for money, they demanded it—(along with their identification cards)—but indirectly via Bloomberg’s “judges.”
And so unofficial scams are not the only ones rife or rampant within NYC. And so the NYC thereby police proved to the NYC populace that their city government is a criminal enterprise, and that the only difference between them and other punks on the streets or in the subways was that they had badges. And as Bernie forcibly stopped his punks, so can the constitutional citizenry forcibly stop their pigs. But without weapons they can hardly stop these cops and robbers. And if these swine in uniform knew the citizenry, like constitutional Bernie, were armed and dangerous, like them, they’d be less likely or willing to hold folks up on the street or on the subway—not even for their imperial, anti-constitutional and tyrannical billionaire mayor Bloomberg. That’s my theory, anyway.
But then again, the
Bernie was arrested, “tried,” “convicted” and jailed for (among other things) possession of an “unlicensed” or “unpermitted” gun or firearm.
“Not in these here parts, cowpoke. We
seceded from the
* * * * *
And so let that be another civics lesson for you, dear reader: Tyranny wants to (unconstitutionally) disarm you and yours (under the precise guise, pretense and pretext of “serving and protecting” you and yours from tyranny, evil, “terror,” and the like).
The Devil wears a halo and the terrible Dragon presents to be the White Knight peremptorily protecting you and yours from the terrible Dragon. See? What’s wrong with this terrible picture, dear reader?
And why dies the tyrant, the Devil or
the Dragon seek to disarm you and yours? So that you and yours shall be
entirely at their mercy. So they can then officially or “legally” rob, abuse,
abduct, enslave, torture and even kill you and yours with complete and total
impunity. For once we’re disarmed, what then can we possibly do about or
against tyranny? How then can we stop them? By getting out our slingshots, our
baseball bats, our
(By the way, speaking of Bowie knives, did you know that knives with greater than six inch blades are illegal in NYC, and hence a crime for any citizen to possess? And so if Bloomberg’s blue swine only had access to everyone’s kitchen, hundreds of thousands of NYC housewives could then “legally” be abducted and held for ransom until their fines were paid in full. That would help reduce the mayor’s annual spending or budget deficit. So perhaps Bloomberg will instruct his city council to include a kitchen “sneak and peak” clause or “provision” within their very next legislative act of “patriotism.”)
* * *
For would-be tyrants seek absolute, total(itarian), anti-constitutional powers over you and yours. For unchecked power has power to do whatsoever it bloody wants. Such is tyranny. And who wants and who strives to obtain such absolute power but those (would-be fascist, Marxist, communist or zionist dictators) who crave to possess, wield, brandish and use such power (against you and yours)? And why? Because you and yours are so “terribly” threatening to their tyranny? Or because tyrants feel so “terribly” threatened by you, your truth, your B.B. gun and/or your Bowie knife? Or because such despotic creatures have black hearts, dark desires, malevolent intentions, tyrannical tendencies and mass-murderous souls?
Study the rise, methods and practices
of their “
But methinks what’s truly terrible is citizens without guns to protect themselves from such armed criminals, such predatory police, tyrannical public officials and other public enemies within “public” offices.
And such a disarming state of public affairs as has existed and persisted within NYC for years, decades, even generations, is by definition a “police state,” a totalitarian state, a Marxist, “jewish” or “communist” state. In other words, the communist state of Jew York.
And you don’t want to go there, dear readers, not if you know what’s good for you, and not unless you absolutely have to. And many therein who could make enough money would sure as shooting get out in a hurry.
* * * * *
And by the way, what in hell is “
“Zionism is racism,” once declared the general assembly (i.e. all the nations) of the United Nations Organization.
(But the U.N.’s “security council,” throne, crown, or
“supreme soviet” has always been far too zionist or “jewish” to ever admit or
confess it—being comprised of the five (or rather four) “jewish” victors of the
second “jewish” world-war against the free and independent Gentile nations of
the globe: i.e. “jewish”-Amerika, “jewish”
And the general assembly of Gentile nations was of course
correct is saying that “zionism is racism,” i.e. “jewish” racism. But that
simple statement was the most the U.N. has ever said against “jewish” racism,
and the one and only time they ever said so. Needless to say, it (they) has
never done anything against “jewish”
racism or “zionism”—neither in
Yes, publicly admitting or professing the obvious truth that
“zionism is racism” was the one and only time the Jew N. tail ever dared bark
against its zionist “jewish” creator, master and owner. And though it barked
once, and only once, the Jew N. will probably
And so therefore to look to the Jew N. as a possible solution to the very rabid “beastly” problem which it (they) has always served, furthered and over-fed from its very violent beginning up to its present monstrous proportions, is political madness and the height of international folly. Is it not? You just can’t expect salvation or liberation from the Devil, Its kindred, or their imperial, supernational, SuperNazi or “beastly” tool.
* * * * *
On the other hand, and to be fair, racism sounds and looks worse than it is. For what is racism if not love of (or preference for) one’s race—as nationalism is love of (or preference for) one’s nation. I’m not saying you should or shouldn’t love or prefer your family, your tribe, your race or your nation, dear reader. That’s your decision and your private business. But if you do love them, I don’t hate you for it nor don’t condemn you for it. Why should I? And why should you? Why should you not love and prefer people like yourself? Why should you feel guilty for loving or preferring your own kind? Why should you hate yourself and your kindred? Are you and your kind so very evil, despicable, hateworthy? Why, dear reader, should you be for my race or for their race (family, tribe or nation) instead of for your own race? These are questions for yourself to answer, AND FOR NO ONE TO ANSWER FOR YOU!
Why should tribes or races be hated, condemned or
criminalized for wanting to live together? Why should they be punished and
forcibly separated or scattered for their “racism”? No one is suggesting this
should happen to “jews,” zionists or “
The Olympic games are presently being held once again, and within their ancient Grecian homeland. Now should you not hope or wish that the athletes of your particular race or nation shall win the games and medals they’re presently competing for, for fear of being hated or condemned by others for thus being too narrow or parochial, too racist or nationalistic? I don’t say so. What do you say?
So how you feel and what you think about yourself, your family, your race or your nation, dear reader, is your very own business and hence none of mine. And vice-versa.
And yet some psychological fascists among us have in the past and will continue to try to dictate and control what you think and how you feel about your race and/or your nation. Is this not so? And so who are these racist dictators or dictatorial racists? Are they the hated Europeans: the French, the Germans, the Irish, etc.? No? Then who are they? Are they Gentiles, Christians or Mohammedans?
And what races are so racist, dear reader, (other than the “jew” and his allied, subordinate and violent pet Negro, of course), as to demand of you (and your race) that you hate your own race in favor of and preference for their race instead of your own? Is this not the very epitome and extremity of racial aggression or racist predation?: To attempt to dictate the very thoughts and feelings and to possess and control the very minds and hearts of those races which these racial or racist predators would thus prey upon?: To demand of preyed upon or enslaved races that they hate their very own kind, race or nation in favor or fear of these very predatory races who thus dictate to them and prey upon them?
Do your racial enemies want (and even demand) that you hate yourself, your race and your nation so that you won’t defend yourself against these your racial enemies? Do your racial enemies war thus against you and yours psychologically as well as physically?
For he or they who think, imagine or believe they deserve to be racially abused or preyed upon are less likely to resist it, and hence to evade, oppose, defy or fight their racial abusers, predators and enemies. (See e.g. “collective, genetic or racial guilt.”)
And so this is where the “jewish” media-monopoly and their control of “public” schooling does its dark, poisonous, racist work and damage. (See and hear e.g. the “jewish” “holocaust” and/or “black slavery.”)
And yet, try as I might, I can’t recall “gassing” any “jews” or owning or exploiting any Negro slaves. Can you, dear reader? And can any Negroes or “jews” really and truly recall being enslaved or gassed? Or do they merely pretend to?
And is my European race or family really and truly more evil, more demonic, more Satanic, predatory or hateworthy than these races who hate, attack and slander them so? Well, let’s see. Let’s put both accuser and accused races upon the racial balances. Lets find out who owes who what. Let’s count the racial offenses of each race, the pros and cons of each, the racial plusses and minuses of each, the relative predatoriness of each, the ways in which the accused races deserve or do not deserve to be thus hated, abused and preyed upon by their racial accusers, extorters, attackers or predators. For this is the way of justice, is it not? And we want to be racially just, do we not? “No [racial] justice, no peace,” right?
And which is the far more racist race, dear reader: The race that’s attacking or invading? Or the race that’s running away (from the race that’s attacking or invading them)?
In this racial light, see e.g. “white flight.” See how they run! How very racist of them!—not to want to be Negro prey, but to desire instead to run away! They should be racially ashamed of themselves, don’t you think?
And note also the current Mexican invasion. Note how the
president and the Congress do next to nothing to stop it, but rather encourage
it by further talk of alien “amnesty.” How treasonous is that, to draw
uncrossable lines of ultimatum within foreign countries, but not draw one
(But where on earth can the terrorized, robbed, dispossessed
and driven out Palestinians go, if not back to their beloved homeland of
* * * * *
And so I do not condemn racism nor nationalism—(also called “nazism”). But I make a distinction between defensive and offensive racism or nationalism.
When you are attacked, should you defend yourself? How about your family, your tribe, your race or your nation? Should you defend them? Should you defend your race or nation against (what else but?) an offensive, aggressive, invasive race or nation, or empire?
And so “offensive” or “aggressive” racism is invading, conquering, enslaving or otherwise preying upon other races or nations—(and mentally or psychologically as well as physically). And the ultimate racism or nationalism is imperialism, super-racism or super-nationalism (SuperNazism)—whereby one race or nation desires or attempts to conquer all others.
And so where does “jewish” racism or zionism fall or belong along this continuum of racism or nationalism? Is zionism defensive or offensive racism or nationalism (a.k.a. “nazism”)? And if the latter, is zionism super-racism or super-nationalism (a.k.a. SuperNazism)?
* * *
(Do you understand money, dear reader? Do you know that (and how) money rules the world—or rather how money’s makers, creators, printers and lenders rule or control the world? Do you know about “central banking”? Do you know who the world’s “central” banksters are? And of what race? Hint: They’re not Gentiles. They are none other than that most predatory, offensive, aggressive or racist race which conceived, invented and imperiously imposed their “debt-token, monopoly-money” upon us all. (See The Monetary/Economic Problem and the Honest Money Solution. To understand money is to understand the modern world, how it is controlled, and by whom. Whether you know it or not, dear reader, you need to know about money.)
* * *
Jews say theirs is a defensive racism or nationalism—if they admit their racism, nationalism or “nazism” at all.
Non-“jews” cannot become citizens of “
And yet “jews,” zionists or “Israelis” dare condemn Gentiles
for doing the very same thing, for having their own racial or religious laws,
preferences, exclusivities. And “jews” even war against Gentiles militarily,
diplomatically and/or economically for being racist or having racial laws. (See
And so the very racism, nationalism or “nazism” which “jews”
arrogate, take or give to themselves they deny to you and I, dear
* * *
Zionism is racist because it’s “jewish.” For if it’s “jewish,” how could it not be racist? For “jewism” is a racism or nazism so vehement, so virulent, so heartfelt and extreme that it’s a “religion,” a “creed,” a (racist) “culture,” a racist, nationalist or “nazi” way of life. Is this not plainly and clearly so?
The zionists (i.e. “Israelis” or “jews”) say they are merely
defending themselves against Gentile, Palestinian, Arabic or Mohammedan
aggression and “terrorism.” But if so, they why does “
And why aren’t Palestinians similarly “settling” in “
Just count the victims on both sides, dear reader. Just
count the corpses, the casualties, the prisoners, the tortured victims both
sides, both “jewish” and Palestinian. Just see who are continually losing their
land and who are continually, aggressively, offensively taking it from them.
It’s abundantly clear for all who wish to see who the real and true terrorists
* * * * *
Where does “zionism” come from, dear reader?—aside from the “jew” or the “Israeli”?
And as Moses pretended his god or God lived within his holy
box, tent or “tabernacle,” so did the Mosites. And king David’s son and heir,
Solomon, had Moses’ holy box moved to another hill within or atop
Now king David wrote and sang songs or “psalms.” And the 6th verse of David’s 2nd song goes something like this: (Hit it!)
Yet have I [the god of Moses–Ed.] set my king [David–Ed.] upon my holy hill of Zion. I will declare the decree: the Lord said unto me, thou [David–Ed.] (art) my son; this day have I begotten thee. Ask of me, and I shall give (thee) [king David and/or his “zionist” heirs–Ed.] the heathen [i.e. the Gentiles–Ed.] (for) thine inheritance, and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession. Thou shalt break them [the “heathen” Gentiles–Ed.] with a rod of iron; thou shalt dash them into pieces like a potter’s vessel. [song #2:6-9]
King David just loved Gentiles, didn’t he? And he loved to sing his (very own) “holy” praises! Note how blasphemously he thus declares himself God’s son and heir, and thus grants himself God’s Gentile world and every “heathen” thing in it as his (and his heirs’) personal property.
“Just ask the world of me and its yours,” allegedly says the god of Moses to its king David (who put these very words in its mouth)—the king who “set” himself upon the god’s “holy hill of Zion” and with much fanfare moved Moses’ holy box thereto.
Now dear reader, can we safely assume the “zionists,” “Hebrews” or “jews” have not merely been fervently craving or “religiously” desiring God’s world and everything in it—(including all Gentiles or “heathens” as their slaves, “inheritance” or “possession”)—but that they’ve also always been incessantly asking God for it?—insofar as they believed in Him at all. And if so, and David’s lyric is true, then why have they yet to receive their most fervent craving or “religious” desire: God’s world and everything in it?
And by the way, is that not offensively racist,
nationalistic or “nazi” to desire to own all other races or nations (and all
their property) as your “possession” or “inheritance”? Is this not
super-racism, super-nationalism or Super-Nazism? And is there any other
(Gentile) race or nation half as racist as these “
(Methinks this Davidic lyric was, is and shall ever be no more than wishful “Hebrew” thinking, and zionist blasphemy. What do you think?)
And if you’ve noticed, zionists have never been content to wait for “God” to give them His world “for an inheritance.” For methinks they would indeed need to wait forever, and then some. For surely God would never, ever give up His world to them, or even surrender it—on the contrary. (See e.g. Matt. 21:33-46, -12 & Luke 19:12-15 & :27)
“Zionists” have been forever working, plotting, dreaming,
scheming toward that very end: world conquest and enslavement of the Gentiles.
(Note how they succeeded within their terribly mass-murderous and predatory “
That’s one reason they hated, rejected, tortured and murdered Jesus-God, because He was not the “messiah” or Davidic king they ordered or had in mind, one who would conquer the world for them and lay it at their cloven feet. But surely God, including the lifetime when He was Jesus of Nazareth, has always had far better things to do with His world kingdom than ever to deliver or surrender it to the demonic spawn of His Enemy, Satan, the lying, slanderous, murderous Devil. (John 8:44) And “like father, like son,” or daughter.
And that, dear readers, is “
And therefore all so-called “Christian-zionists” are likewise anti-Christs. “Christian zionists” are synonymous with “Christian-Anti-Christs” or “Christian-Satanists.” It’s an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms which makes no sense whatsoever, and which slanders Christians.
* * * * *
Around 1,100 A.D., the anti-Christ “holy father” or “pope”
(But if they had simply asked the Mohammedans nicely, maybe they would have been welcomed therein.)
This mad “crusade” for the Roman “pope” might perhaps be called “Christian.” (“Crusade” comes from the Roman “cruciare,” to mark with the Christian cross or “crux”.)
But this current “crusade” for the anti-Christ “jews” is absolutely Satanic. So lets not go there (again), dear Christians. It’s not you fight—unless you want to help the Mohammedans recapture the holy land for the both of you to peacefully share, once again, as you did before the “jews” invaded in the last century, with their Jew N.’s help, blessing, sanction and cover.
Yet it’s only land, and to worship this “holy land” is a kind of idolatry. And land thus polluted by demonic, two-legged swine for so many decades can hardly be called “holy.” And besides, God left there a long time ago. You’re never even gonna find His footprints therein. So forget about it!
It’s bad enough to want to invade, rob or steal this “holy land” for yourselves, dear Christians, but to be murderous mercenaries for the sake of the enemies of Jesus-God, and to kill or mass-murder Mohammedans for the “jews,” the zionists, the anti-Christs (within Washington, Tel Aviv or Jerusalem) is absolutely evil and positively demonic. So don’t.
And so for all these reasons and more, this “new [zionist or “jew”] American century,” this current “hundred years’ war” against the Mohammedansm is not a Christian “crusade” for “God and country,” but an anti-Christian or zionist “crusade” for Satan, Its world-wide sinagog, and Its beastly, imperial, SuperNazi “jews,” and for that blasphemous “abomination of desolation” called “Israel.” (Apo./Rev. 2:9 & 3:9 & Matt. 24:14-29 & Mark 13:14-25)
* * * * *
Mohammedans are far more tolerant of Christians or
Christianity than are “jews” or
But all non-Christian “jews” everywhere are automatic
“Israeli” citizens with dual citizenship, and hence with dual (and rather
dubious) loyalty to their respective Gentile nations—loyalty they generally
never really harbored anyway. Is this not so? And has this not always been so?
See how yet once again they force you and your countrymen to mass-murder for
them—as formerly in
And since the bastard birth of this “
(And the Arabs who have not yet been genocided by the “jews” have yet remained behind simply because this is their land and they have nowhere else to go.)
And even in Christian countries wherein they reside, “jews” or anti-Christs have outlawed all public expression of Christ and Christianity in all public spaces and places (such as gov’t schools) and at all public events. Is this not so? For “jews” hate God and every mention of His (Christian) name. Even the Christian holy day, which department store “jews” have perverted into a bonanza of commercial exploitation, the anti-Christs have renamed Xmas—thus crossing out the holy name of God they hate so much. So much do they hate and want to obliterate the (old) name of the God—not to mention God Himself. (Apo./Rev. 19:12, & John & :40)
And therefore for all these reasons and more, it would be
far better for all Christians everywhere if the Mohammedans were (once again)
to control and possess of the “holy land,” than for these present anti-Christs,
And these zionists, anti-Christs, “Israelis” or “jews,” who,
as always, seek to capture the entire world as their “possession” and to
enslave all Gentiles as their “inheritance,” would make
* * * * *
And as nationalism is “Nazism,” it follows that “jewish”
imperialism or super-nationalism is SuperNazism. And hence the “jews” have been
given their favorite word back, where it property belongs, don’t you think? Or
whom does that
Zionism is therefore the most offensive racism because it
(they) intends to conquer the Gentile world—as they slanderously charge Hitler
intended. But aside from seeking “living space” and farmland for bread in the
And whether the imperialist “jew” claims to be an atheist,
“communist” or humanist, or a zionist or “messianist” makes no real difference
whatsoever. The intent and aim of both “jews” is the very same: Imperial,
supernational or SuperNazi conquest of the entire Gentile globe—of every other
Question: How racist or “nazi” is that?
Answer: Super-racist and super-nazi.
The “jewish” “communists” pretend to be working for
humanity, but the
The former “jews” are atheist or “secular,” the latter “religious.” (“Israelis” by the way, are predominately atheists.) But they both devoutly desire or religiously crave to either conquer, own and enslave all Gentiles, or else put them in the grave.
The essential difference between “communism” and “
* * *
Again, most “jews” and “Israelis” do not even believe in God. They are atheists.
Furthermore, most “jews” and “Israelis” are not even “jews.”
And thanks to “jews,” “jewish”-Amerika is becoming like “Israel,” a terror-state, pretending to protect its citizens from the “terrorism” of the patient and long-suffering enemies they’ve so thoroughly earned, offended, tortured, murdered and terrorized for so long that they’re finally getting a little of their very own (“justice,” “medicine” or “terror”) back. (Matt. 7:1-2 & Luke 6:36-38)
So let’s not go there, dear Gentile
* * *
And did you know these facts about “
And if the latter, than this is clearly deceit by omission by those (“jews”) who control everything you see on T.V., hear on radio and read in print. For only the “news that fits” or furthers the “jews” and their dark agenda do the “jews” ever want you to see, hear or read.
For why would you, dear Gentile, want to sacrifice your tax-money and perhaps even your own or your loved ones’ life-blood for the benefit of those who pretend to be “God’s chosen people,” but who really and truly don’t even believe He exists, much less know or love Him.
And if they did know God, they’d demonically and deicideally hate Him exactly like they hate Jesus-God, whose divinity they’ve always denied. For to admit the divinity of God would be to confess whose “chosen people” and children they really and truly are (John -44), and Whose proverbial “vineyard” or world-kingdom they’ve always fervently, devoutly, “religiously” and demonically craved to usurp from its rightful Owner, Creator and Heir. (Matt. 21:33-46 & John 1:1-3) (See “jewism” or “zionism.”)
* * * * *
And so “
Is “Neo” therefore a “Neo-Nazi” in a defensive war against
these most offensive, aggressive
“It ends tonight.” Can you dig it? (I knew that you could.)
* * * * *
(“But to speak, stand up for or defend Gentiles, Palestinians, Arabs or Mohammedans against Jews is racist!”)
So, to desire your race not
be devoured by predatory races is “racist,” but for predatory races (e.g.
“jews” and their Negroes) to prey upon you and your race is not? For your race
to wish not to be invaded, dispossessed and devoured by “jews” (and their
allies) is “racist”? And therefore to separate yourselves from your racial
enemies or predators is “racist”? But for “jews” to fervently desire, to
“religiously” seek and even to super-nationally succeed in invading, devouring,
conquering and subjecting all races, all nations, all Gentiles, all humanity is
not racist, because
Think again, dear Gentile. And study The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
* * * * *
The present and immediate concern is for those poor,
unfortunate Arabic and Mohammedan Gentiles living within the intentionally
terrifying reach, the mass-murderous grasp and the torturous clutches of both
imperial “jewish”-Amerika and “
But ultimately the common concern and common interest is for all Gentiles all over God’s globe to oppose the great racist evil that is “jewish” zionism. For, as always, but especially now more than ever, we are all living within the nuclear sights, and under the dark, Satanic, terrible, torturous and mass-murderous shadow of world zionism, “jewish” imperialism, “jewish” super-racism, super-nationalism or SuperNazism. And this great Satanic evil empire had been growing unchecked for generations.
* * * * *
And this latest
(Even the “Israelis” themselves have publicly admitted that
this present war of theirs against the Mohammedans shall last one-hundred
years. They mean until they win, and with
But let’s not and say we did. We don’t wanna get dragged into it. We want no part of it. We don’t need no more guilt nor innocent blood upon our hands. No way, Hozay, no how; neither tomorrow, yesterday, nor now.
* * * * *
But the “jewish” “public officials” over
And “his [zionist] honor” clearly aims to see there shall be
no protestations to the contrary, not in “his” city, the city which he bought
like a Babylonian whore. And now we can all see why. To give her yet more
innocent blood to drink, and hence be bloody guilty for. (
* * * * *
And so if the Gentile American public want to protest imperialist “jewish”-Amerikan violence against Gentiles and Gentile nations anywhere in the world, the public are officially, mayorally forbidden to assemble in the N.Y. city streets, such as “times square,” or around the “United Nations” building, because that would block, disrupt or prevent city traffic, which is sacred, unless of course the zionist-“republican” president Bush II is in town, or his and Bloomberg’s good buddies, “Bibi” or “Ariel”, or the “republicans” are holding a party convention.
For these things matter (to the “jewish,” zionist, “Israeli”
mayor). But the Gentile public, his imperial zionist majesty’s subjects,
plainly do not matter whatsoever. They’re just a nuisance and an obstruction to
“his honor’s” imperialist “jewish” agenda against Gentile humanity—both
Mohammedan and Christian. And so the
people of “jewish” Amerika cannot have their own party, public assembly, nor
convention, not within
* * * * *
The zionist “republicans” are “permitted” to come and
peaceably assemble or convene within
But if Bloomberg called the public to come assemble and
listen to him speak in the park or in the street (in the “great lawn” or before
the United Nations’ bldg., e.g.), would
But presently within
And methinks this zionist, “jewish” mayor of
And again I suspect mayor Bloomberg (and his zionist co-conspirators befouling NYC’s “public” offices) simply don’t want the world to see the enormity of the crowd assembled to oppose them and their zionist-“republican” party: To congregate, to speak, to protest and to “demonstrate” against their violent, mass-murderous, racist, zionist, imperialist, genocidal wars against the Gentiles of the middle east, and elsewhere.
And so once again, as always, we see there’s one law for the
zionists or the “jews,” and another law for the Gentiles or everyone else. But
what if the
And again these American citizens (or are they Bloomberg’s
imperial subjects? That is the question, which if you notice, no Jew York state
nor city judges are answering in the public’s or the constitution’s favor)
clearly are coming to hear those who indeed do speak for them, or with whom they are in tune or agreement. But
the fascistic mayor of NYC will not “permit” it, and he thereby criminalizes or
outlaws it, and his violent police dogs stand ready and willing to pummel and
abduct any and all practicing
* * * * *
What a political asset and agent the “Israelis” have in
their New York/Jew York mayor! But they’re a foreign power. So there should be
a law against that, or at least one that is actually enforced by real and true
“law enforcers.” (For see how these false “law-enforcers” enforce fascistic,
communistic mayoral decrees while real and true law-enforcers are nowhere to be
seen—at least not in this city, this
And the zionist city council did not object, then and now.
And the city’s zionist “judges” did not object, then and now. And the state
supreme court of New York, which is sworn to protect and defend our
constitutional rights, just like those fascist pigs in the street, did not
object, then and now. I’m convinced.
But are all these “public” officials “Israeli” agents and/or rabid, belligerent, partisan “jews”? They why don’t they ever perform their sworn duties to “protect and defend” our constitutional rights?—which include the right to “peaceably assemble,” to listen to music, see a play, e.g., or to hear the words of speakers. And yes, even political speakers, and even speakers with whom the NYC mayor disagrees or disapproves—and hence unconstitutionally outlaws or illegally criminalizes for daring to speak without his imperious majesty’s permission, along with his or her hearers for daring to listen (without his imperious majesty’s permission).
* * * * *
And the almost total silence of the city’s jewspapers (and its “jewish” T.V. and radio monopoly) on these repressive, anti-constitutional, anti-American, fascistic, Marxist, communist or “jewish” political tactics, is absolutely deafening to all (true “republicans,” “democrats,” libertarians and/or constitutionalists) with ears to hear. Deafening and shameful, but not at all surprising. For all “jewish” fruit is and must be of its (intolerant, repressive, fascistic, totalitarian, censorious) “jewish” tree. Consequently, anybody who trusts or accepts this city as any source or news, much less as the “media capital of the world,” has absolutely no sense nor “nose” for truth.
And by the way, this Bloomberg is a billionaire media mogul. He funds the “Charlie Rose” interview show on P.B.S., who, as any objective observer can tell you, is not only a fellow “jew,” but yet another undeclared “Israeli” “foreign agent of influence” likewise located in and broadcasting from this most anti-Christian and anti-Gentile capital city.
And these “jews” didn’t seek, purchase and obtain their
mass-media monopoly for nothing, you know, as little as the mayor did his
office. (See also Berlesconi of
* * * * *
And by the way, where are the “jewish” anti-Vietnam war
protestors? And where are all those anti-war “folk-singers” like Zimmerman
(“Dylan”), Baez, Peter, Paul and Mary (all “jews”), or Seeger and Guthrie? Where
were they during the first war against
And why did they never, ever protest against the ongoing
“Israeli” genocide or “holocaust” of the Palestinians? Where are all their
hammers or bells now as then to “hammer [or] ring out ‘Danger,’ ‘Warning’ and
‘Love’ between my brothers and my sisters [the “jews” and the Arabs–Ed.] all
over this land”? Where are all their “hammers of justice,” their “bells of
freedom,” their “songs about love between” the “jews” and the Arabs all over this
world? Deafeningly silent they are and have always been, about the violent
growth and murderous expansion of the terror-state of “
(Is this not so? Do you care, dear Gentile American? You should, if only for purely selfish reasons. For look, it is written, that your bloody city, if not your bloody country, and your whole bloody, mass-murderous, “jewish”-Amerikan empire shall eventually be repaid in its/their very own violent coin. (Apo./Rev. 18:1-8 & 19:1-3) Alleluia?)
These “jewish” “anti-war” or “peace-protestors” and their
kindred are nowadays (and formerly) nowhere to be seen nor heard. Why not? Why
is that? They’re not dead. They still perform here and there. So why don’t they
protest against these “Israeli,” zionist or “jewish”-Amerikan wars (against who
and what else but
Is this not why?: Because they are “jews,” and because these
endless wars against Palestinians, Iraqis, etc are “jewish” wars against Gentiles, or rather the continuation of their
eternal war against them/us? And so are these alleged “anti-war protestors”
racist “jews,” zionists or pro-“Israelis”? Is it not clear and obvious that
these “jewish” anti-war protestors were never really and truly against war at
all, but only against non-“jewish” wars (like
All together now, with feeling:
“Where have all the…[“jewish” anti-war protestors–Ed.] gone?/ Long time…[silent–Ed.]/
Where have all the…[“jewish” anti-war protestors–Ed.] gone?/ Long time ago./
Where have all the…[“jewish” anti-war protestors–Ed.] gone?/ Gone…[to Zion–Ed.] for soldiers everyone./
When will they ever learn?/ When will they ever learn?”
(My guess? Probably
* * * * *
And methinks the same is true and hence can be said of the “jewish” media-monopoly, which in the 60’s played up, supported, favorably covered, indeed celebrated the anti-Vietnam war movement.
But see how they all now as one play down, if not ignore, the anti-Iraq war movement, and the “new [“jew”]-American century” and/or the zionists’ or “Israelis” (and hence the Amerikans?) “hundred years’ war” against the Arabs or the Mohammedans?
And for the very same reason: It’s a “jewish” war against
Just compare the “jewish” mass-media’s “outrage” at the
police repression of peace protestors at the democratic party’s national convention in
It matters, dear readers, who owns the mass-media, and hence
who “reports” (or fails to report) the news, who plays what up and who plays
what down, who celebrates this and who ignores that, who is outraged at this
and who is not at that, who makes mountains of ant-hills, and ant-hills out of
mountains. As the camera lens can and does distorts reality at “long” or “wide”
angles, so can and does the “jewish”-Amerikan mass-media monopoly deliberately
distort or ignore truth and reality. The mass-media is to a nation what a mind
is to its body. And so the “jews” have deliberately and malevolently possessed
Let’s not go there, dear
* * * * *
And the same goes for the “A.C.L.U.,” the “
* * * * *
I have spoken of the racist, zionist, “jewish”-“republican”
party. But the “democratic” party is no less so, if not more so. Yes, the
“republican” and “democratic” parties are both “jewish” or
Consider, dear reader: The incumbent
“republican” presidential candidate is a zionist “Christian”—(or so he claims).
And the challenging “democratic” candidate is a zionist “jew”—(using an Irish
name, and pretending to be a Roman Catholic). Thus no matter which zionist
wins, the zionists win! The game is rigged, dear readers. The cards are stacked
* * *
So, therefore, what the
What then shall we call our party but the “National
* * *
Both the presidential candidates, “republican” and “democrat,” are members of the very same Godless, evil, supernationally subversive and revolutionary secret society called “Skull and Bones,” to which they have both sworn eternal loyalty and secrecy, as part of their dark initiation ceremonies. As with others secret societies this sort, they have sworn under pain of death (by other members or their agents) to place this secret society of theirs above God, country, family, race, nation, anything and everything. This secret society is to be as God to them, and they must obey it unto death.
And true to their dark oaths, neither candidate will discuss
their “Skull and Bones” membership, nor what secret plans they have been given
(or shall be given) to execute as president of these
We were not promised domestic tyranny by this Bush II. We were not promised a “New [and “jew”] Amerikan century”
(of wars against sovereign Gentile nations). We were not promised “Patriot
Acts,” nor any invasion of
Do you think these evil plans were not in place (and these
evil instructions not given) well before “
The greatest Evil wears the greatest halo (as disguise). The greatest terrorist pretends to be the greatest anti-terrorist. The Dragon pretends to be the White Knight. What else? What better disguise? Isn’t it the very nature, character and method of Evil to play God or angel, and the Dragon to pretend to be the protective White Knight combating the Dragon, peremptorily protecting us all from “Terror,” Evil, “axis of Evil,” etc. Can you see “Uncle” Satan the Dragon through Its White Knight disguises and Godly pretences, dear readers?
And methinks all members of such secret revolutionary societies covertly working for a one-world dictatorship (or “new world order”—Bush I) should be forever barred from holding public offices. (It’s an obvious “no-brainer, isn’t it?)
The zionist-“democratic” presidential candidate now says he
would have chosen, elected or voted to invade
Question: How can a candidate for the highest public office in the nation (or rather empire) possibly get away with that?
Answer: The “jewish”-Amerikan mass-media monopoly lets him.
Methinks “Kerry’s” secret and hidden foreign policy agenda is precisely the same as his “Skull and Bones” brother and fellow zionist imperialist, Bush II: to continue the “new [‘jew’] Amerikan century” of “jewish” or zionist imperialism around the Gentile globe. In other words, methinks “Kerry” is a racist, zionist, SuperNazi “jew” out to conquer the Gentile world for his SuperNazi race, nation and secret “handlers” within (and above) his secret “Skull and Bones” society.
Wouldn’t it be better if public officials were of the same society we are, instead of some secret society out to conquer and corral us all into their “new [jew] world-order”? Wouldn’t it be better if public officials were on our side instead of secretly working against us, to conquer and enslave us all under a brutal, world-wide, zionist or communist dictatorship, a supernational or SuperNazi anti-Christ “jewish” empire, a “messianic” or Satanic “jewish” empire or “beast”? Wouldn’t it be better if the highest public officials within the greatest public offices were not secretly in fact the public’s greatest public enemies?
And since both candidates are clearly
What Gentile America desperately
needs is a
* * * * *
They don’t tell you nor promise you this, dear reader,
(because they know this won’t get your vote, but your goat), and correct me if
I’m wrong, but it’s my understanding that after this 2004 election, both
zionist candidates for the
(This is surely Soviet, Marxist, “jewish” communism or
zionism come to
And this military “draft” is for these (“democratic” or
“republican”) zionists to continue to wage their “jewish”-“Israeli,”
imperialist, supernational or SuperNazi war of a “hundred years” against the
Mohammedans: to invade and conquer them; to occupy them; to impose their
(For the world is a big place for
Do you know what “depleted
“Depleted uranium” is a most hard or dense material, and
hence is used as tank armor to keep metal projectiles from penetrating, and
also as metal projectiles, (even large bullets), to penetrate the hardest metal
(armored tanks, etc). And upon impact radioactive dust particles are released
into the air, and hence into your lungs, your skin, the water, the soil, etc. (
Depleted uranium is radioactive death not only for the soldiers on the battlefield, but especially for the civilian Arabic or Mohammedan populace. Depleted uranium is therefore “jewish”-Amerikan genocide disguised as warfare. And the soldiers or “human resources” of this Super-Nazi, anti-Christ, “jewish”-Amerikan “beast” are “expendable” in the process.
* * * * *
In “jewish”-Amerika, around 1940, while Hitler was leader of
But “jews” were never jailed for advocating that Amerika
shouldn’t attack, invade and conquer “
And not only has Amerika never
attacked nor warred against “jews” nor “Israelis”—(as it has/they have twice
warred against Germans and Germany)—but since 1913 and their “jewish” “central”
bank, the “Federal Reserve Corporation,” and their world war I against the
Gentiles, Amerika has repeatedly warred for
the “jews.” It/she has repeatedly invaded, conquered, mass-murdered and
occupied foreign Gentile nations for
the “jews,” for the international, supernational or SuperNazi “jews.” Is this
not Historically so? Just look at W.W. I, W.W. II,
When and where will this endless,
imperialist, supernationalist “jewish”-Amerikan slaughter of
The truth is that
* * * * *
Now in the 1980’s, and in a concerted international attempt
to bring that Gentile country down, N.Y.C. divested from “racist”
Why then didn’t
* * *
And are the Negroes of South Africa truly better off now
than when the
And if one points or looks to Haiti, that black “bastion of
democracy, stability, progress and prosperity” in the new world, (not neglect
Detroit, MI or
For order (whether individual, collective, racial, social or political) is genetic, mental, spiritual. And for the fruit (of order, productivity, prosperity) to ever develop, manifest or appear upon a tree, its seed must preexist therein. For the outside is merely the physical manifestation of the genetic, spiritual inside.
(Can you dig it? Can you cultivate it? Can you bring it to
fruition? Can you create a “city on a hill”? Not unless it genetically
preexists within you and yours?) And so that’s also why “
* * *
But, on the other hand, does
But the Jewnighted Nations (which created this terror-state
* * *
And the U.N’s trade embargo or blockade of
But the Jew N. has never insisted on disarming “
Furthermore, the Jew N. has never “resolved” to starve “
* * *
And so for all these reasons and more, the U.N. is really
and truly the Jew N., as surely as
And therefore to look to this Jew N. for a just solution to this perpetually open, bleeding and festering “middle eastern” sore, this permanently inflamed middle eastern problem, (i.e. this eternal “jewish”/zionist/“Israeli” problem), is like looking to the Devil (or Its SuperNazi “beast”) for spiritual salvation or earthly liberation. Forget about it! It’s a vain, hopeless, fruitless exercise in futility. The Jew N. doesn’t save, it damns.
* * *
And the JewNighted Nations Org. has likewise showed the
world how to deal with this nuclear terror-state of “
And then we can all watch that racist, mass-murderous,
terror-state of “
* * * * *
And finally this: Also in the 80’s, “Little Steven and the Imperials” (with Bone-o) were good enough to conduct a series of concerts to help bring down European South Africa.
And furthermore, they weren’t “gonna’ play Sun Citaaaaay”! But if you notice, they don’t individually mind playing “Tel Aviv,” etc., do they?
They weren’t gonna “stab their [black–Ed.] brothers in the
back”. But they’ve evidently got no brown brothers in
Where are all the concerts to help bring down the far more
racist, zionist, “jewish,” Marxist “
Is it not because these “compassionate artists” are in fact racist, zionist hypocrites like those aforementioned “jewish” folkies? Is it not because they are smug, arrogant, self-righteous and “politically correct” (i.e. “jewish”) Marxists. (For “political correctness” is “jewish” intolerance of the truth.) Note the bloody red stars they wear with arrogant pride.
(Or perhaps some are silent “for fear of the Jews.” (John & ) or in fear for their artistic careers and recording contracts? (For many foolish musicians (some even gifted by the Muse) have sold their souls to the Devil or the “jew” for recoding contracts.)
* * *
But, since these Marxists or communists were pleased to
force the Europeans (who’d preferred to live separate, apart or “apartied”) to
live “integrated” with the Negroes, I propose that they, with their families
and all their money be similarly sent to live with their black “brothers” in
So, let’s forcibly remove them all from their gated
communities where they’ve lived separated, segregated, apart or “apartied” from
us regular folks. Let’s make them sell all their homes and all properties
For why should the political, social and racial “blessings” which they’ve so benevolently, generously and coercively showered upon others not extend to themselves and their loved ones? And let them never again depart from their black paradise. And henceforth let them “play Sun Citaaaaay” to their black hearts’ content, until they grow old and die within their gated or “segregated” communities within Johannesburg or wherever they choose to settle in S.A., or until their black “brothers” invade, capture, cook and eat them and their loved ones (if only metaphorically, economically or “communistically”)—whichever comes first. Wouldn’t that be justice, both poetic and musical? Wouldn’t that be music to our ears? Wouldn’t that be tasteful?
(And “Would you like some barbecue sauce on your Bone-o burger?”)
* * * * *